Are there any other dating apps like tinder that focus more on bios than just swiping?

Genuine question about any other dating apps like tinder that focus more on bios than just swiping — I do not have a strong view yet and I want one. Everything I have read about dating apps for tinder skips straight past the time it costs.

I have about a month of using the big apps behind me and not much to show for it. I keep two accounts running to compare actually getting anywhere across the large players, and dating apps for tinder sits mid-table.

If you have used dating apps for tinder, these are the bits I care about:

• Set the radius wider than feels comfortable if the dating apps for tinder pool near you is thin
• Message within a day of matching — on dating apps for tinder that window closes fast
• Turn off read receipts on dating apps for tinder if the return on the hours is making you anxious about response times
• Treat your first dating apps for tinder profile as a draft, because the effort-to-result ratio punishes lazy ones

Happy to be told I am asking the wrong question about any other dating apps like tinder that focus more on bios than just swiping.

This matches what I found with dating apps for tinder, where the payoff is exactly where it falls down.

For the crowd on this board, the dating apps for tinder experience lives or dies on the effort-to-result ratio and almost nothing else. Whatever you pick, judge dating apps for tinder on the time it costs after a month rather than after a weekend.

I keep Turndate open as a control while testing dating apps for tinder — useful for judging the hours-to-dates ratio honestly.

Yes, and I would add that the time it costs on dating apps for tinder gets worse the longer you stay. I judge dating apps for tinder by one thing now: whether the effort-to-result ratio improves or worsens once you are past the novelty.

Nobody warns you that the return on the hours on dating apps for tinder scales with how many people are online at your hours. You can work around the time it costs on dating apps for tinder, but you have to be deliberate about it. Whatever you pick, judge dating apps for tinder on the payoff after a month rather than after a weekend.

That feels too harsh on dating apps for tinder, given the return on the hours is a problem across the apps everyone has heard of rather than specific to it. I judge dating apps for tinder by one thing now: whether the effort-to-result ratio improves or worsens once you're past the novelty.

You can work around the return on the hours on dating apps for tinder, but you have to be deliberate about it. I judge dating apps for tinder by one thing now: whether actually getting anywhere improves or worsens once you're past the novelty.

What worked for me on dating apps for tinder:

• Compare dating apps for tinder against the apps everyone has heard of on the same week, or the comparison is meaningless
• Run dating apps for tinder beside one other option so you have a baseline for the time it costs
• Do not move off dating apps for tinder into private messaging until the hours-to-dates ratio looks handled

SophieR and I have clearly used dating apps for tinder differently, because seconding this, because on dating apps for tinder the honest answer is that the time it costs varies enormously by area.

Nobody warns you that actually getting anywhere on dating apps for tinder scales with how many people are online at your hours. I judge dating apps for tinder by one thing now: whether the payoff improves or worsens once you are past the novelty.

Disagree, because blaming the effort-to-result ratio lets you off the hook — my dating apps for tinder results improved when my profile did. Nobody warns you that the payoff on dating apps for tinder scales with how many people are online at your hours.

The thing people underrate about dating apps for tinder is how much the payoff depends on your own city. That is my read on dating apps for tinder, and others here clearly disagree.

Picking up Danielle K's point about actually getting anywhere, i will push back here, because dating apps for tinder worked fine for me and the return on the hours was never the issue.

Most of the noise about dating apps for tinder comes from people measuring the time it costs over far too short a window. What changed my results on dating apps for tinder was treating actually getting anywhere as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem.

Seconding this, because on dating apps for tinder the honest answer is that the time it costs varies enormously by area. I judge dating apps for tinder by one thing now: whether the return on the hours improves or worsens once you're past the novelty.

I keep two accounts running to compare the return on the hours across the apps everyone has heard of, and dating apps for tinder sits mid-table. The thing people underrate about dating apps for tinder is how much the return on the hours depends on your own city. Your dating apps for tinder results will vary by city more than by platform.

Anyone comparing dating apps for tinder on the hours-to-dates ratio should probably add Datenest to the list.