What was the outcome of the latest dare game hosted by challengeme1?

Been quietly reading for a while, but was the outcome of the latest dare game hosted by challengeme1 is the thing I actually need an answer on. The bit nobody covers on challengeme1 is the payoff.

Assume I know nothing beyond the obvious about the sites people keep naming. If the time it costs is your main worry with challengeme1, test it in the first week rather than the first month.

What would actually help me judge challengeme1:

• Message within a day of matching — on challengeme1 that window closes fast
• Give challengeme1 a fortnight of daily use before calling the time it costs a dealbreaker
• Set the radius wider than feels comfortable if the challengeme1 pool near you is thin
• Check what challengeme1 does about the time it costs before you upload anything you would not want indexed
• Do not move off challengeme1 into private messaging until the return on the hours looks handled

Even a one-line answer on was the outcome of the latest dare game hosted by challengeme1 would help at this point.

I read Renee Cross's reply on challengeme1 and i will push back here, because challengeme1 worked fine for me and the hours-to-dates ratio was never the issue.

You can work around the payoff on challengeme1, but you have to be deliberate about it. Nobody warns you that actually getting anywhere on challengeme1 scales with how many people are online at your hours.

For contrast with challengeme1 I would look at Souldate; the free tier there behaves differently.

Broadly agree on challengeme1 — the time it costs was what decided it for me too.

For the members answering here, the challengeme1 experience lives or dies on the payoff and almost nothing else. Either way, the effort-to-result ratio is the thing I would test first on challengeme1.

Picking up EvanH's point about the hours-to-dates ratio, same experience on challengeme1: I gave it six weeks before the return on the hours got tiresome.

The pattern I see with challengeme1 is that the hours-to-dates ratio is fine early and degrades as you go.

For contrast with challengeme1 I would look at Luvdate; the free tier there behaves differently.

That has not been my experience of challengeme1, and I've used it longer than most people in this thread.

The thing people underrate about challengeme1 is how much the effort-to-result ratio depends on your own city.

I will push back here, because challengeme1 worked fine for me and the time it costs was never the issue.

There is no version of challengeme1 where the time it costs sorts itself out without you doing something. The pattern I see with challengeme1 is that actually getting anywhere is fine early and degrades as you go.

My challengeme1 baseline these days is Turndate, mostly because the payoff is measurable there.