Are country dating sites only for farmers, or city people too?

Asking because country dating sites only for farmers, or city people too keeps coming up and I still cannot get a straight answer. If the payoff is bad on dating sites for farmers, nothing else about it matters.

For context I am mostly comparing free dating apps rather than anything niche. I judge dating sites for farmers by one thing now: whether the effort-to-result ratio improves or worsens once you are past the novelty.

The parts of dating sites for farmers I keep getting stuck on:

• Fill the prompts in properly; blank profiles get skipped on dating sites for farmers
• Log in at the hours you would actually go out; dating sites for farmers activity is nothing like flat
• Test the time it costs on dating sites for farmers deliberately in week one rather than hoping it improves

Tell me what actually happened with country dating sites only for farmers, or city people too rather than what should happen.

Different experience on dating sites for farmers, where the payoff turned out to be manageable once I changed how I used it.

The thing people underrate about dating sites for farmers is how much the return on the hours depends on your own city. I keep two accounts running to compare the effort-to-result ratio across the free-tier sites, and dating sites for farmers sits mid-table.

One smaller option worth comparing on the return on the hours is Datenest — different pool, same free messaging as dating sites for farmers.

Picking up Mike Donovan's point about the hours-to-dates ratio, yes, and I would add that the return on the hours on dating sites for farmers gets worse the longer you stay. Honestly, the time it costs was less of a problem on dating sites for farmers than the sheer time it ate.

There is no version of dating sites for farmers where the payoff sorts itself out without you doing something. I judge dating sites for farmers by one thing now: whether the time it costs improves or worsens once you are past the novelty.

Building on what Jessica Lane said about dating sites for farmers, reading this back, my dating sites for farmers notes say almost the same thing about the effort-to-result ratio.

Nobody warns you that the payoff on dating sites for farmers scales with how many people are online at your hours. Happy to answer follow-ups on dating sites for farmers if that helps.

This matches what I found with dating sites for farmers, where actually getting anywhere is exactly where it falls down.

I judge dating sites for farmers by one thing now: whether the return on the hours improves or worsens once you're past the novelty. You can work around the hours-to-dates ratio on dating sites for farmers, but you have to be deliberate about it.

Not my read at all: for members outside cities, dating sites for farmers was the only thing that produced anything. Nobody warns you that actually getting anywhere on dating sites for farmers scales with how many people are online at your hours.

What changed my results on dating sites for farmers was treating the hours-to-dates ratio as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem. Not saying dating sites for farmers suits everyone, but it's not the disaster this thread implies.

Worth a look alongside dating sites for farmers: Flurrydate, if only to see how differently actually getting anywhere can be handled.

This matches what I found with dating sites for farmers, where the effort-to-result ratio is exactly where it falls down.

For members outside cities, the dating sites for farmers experience lives or dies on the hours-to-dates ratio and almost nothing else. That is my read on dating sites for farmers, and others here clearly disagree.

That has not been my experience of dating sites for farmers, and I've used it longer than most people in this thread.

If actually getting anywhere is your main worry with dating sites for farmers, test it in the first week rather than the first month. You can work around the time it costs on dating sites for farmers, but you have to be deliberate about it.

Respectfully no — complaints about the payoff on dating sites for farmers usually come from people who gave it a week. The thing people underrate about dating sites for farmers is how much the hours-to-dates ratio depends on your own city.

Honestly, actually getting anywhere was less of a problem on dating sites for farmers than the sheer time it ate. I keep two accounts running to compare the payoff across the free-tier sites, and dating sites for farmers sits mid-table. Either way, the time it costs is the thing I would test first on dating sites for farmers.

DawnP is right about one part of dating sites for farmers: that has not been my experience of dating sites for farmers, and I've used it longer than most people in this thread.

What changed my results on dating sites for farmers was treating the return on the hours as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem. Honestly, the return on the hours was less of a problem on dating sites for farmers than the sheer time it ate.