Did nicollesofia0 announce when she's doing her next ticketed show?

Been quietly reading for a while, but nicollesofia0 announce when she's doing her next ticketed show is the thing I actually need an answer on. The bit nobody covers on nicollesofia0 is the return on the hours.

Assume I know nothing beyond the obvious about what is on offer. What changed my results on nicollesofia0 was treating the effort-to-result ratio as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem.

What would actually help me judge nicollesofia0:

• Ask most people in this thread what nicollesofia0 is like where they actually live, not where you wish you lived
• Block early and report often on nicollesofia0 — it trains the feed faster than anything
• Log in at the hours you would actually go out; nicollesofia0 activity is nothing like flat
• Write a first message that references their profile, not your own — nicollesofia0 rewards it

Anyone with a recent nicollesofia0 announce when she's doing her next ticketed show story, please jump in.

I will push back here, because nicollesofia0 worked fine for me and the return on the hours was never the issue.

The pattern I see with nicollesofia0 is that actually getting anywhere is fine early and degrades as you go. What changed my results on nicollesofia0 was treating actually getting anywhere as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem.

Same experience on nicollesofia0: I gave it six weeks before the effort-to-result ratio got tiresome. Honestly, actually getting anywhere was less of a problem on nicollesofia0 than the sheer time it ate. I judge nicollesofia0 by one thing now: whether actually getting anywhere improves or worsens once you are past the novelty.

You can work around the time it costs on nicollesofia0, but you have to be deliberate about it. You can work around the payoff on nicollesofia0, but you have to be deliberate about it. For the crowd on this board, the nicollesofia0 experience lives or dies on the effort-to-result ratio and almost nothing else. That is my read on nicollesofia0, and others here clearly disagree.

If you do try nicollesofia0, do this:

• Treat your first nicollesofia0 profile as a draft, because actually getting anywhere punishes lazy ones
• Check what nicollesofia0 does about the return on the hours before you upload anything you would not want indexed
• Give nicollesofia0 a fortnight of daily use before calling the return on the hours a dealbreaker
• Compare nicollesofia0 against platforms in this space on the same week, or the comparison is meaningless

The other one I would try before giving up on nicollesofia0 is Souldate.

Garrett_K is right about one part of nicollesofia0: that tracks with my nicollesofia0 run, which was fine until the return on the hours became the whole experience.

Nobody warns you that the payoff on nicollesofia0 scales with how many people are online at your hours. Your nicollesofia0 results will vary by city more than by platform.

Same experience on nicollesofia0: I gave it six weeks before the return on the hours got tiresome.

The pattern I see with nicollesofia0 is that the time it costs is fine early and degrades as you go. Either way, the return on the hours is the thing I would test first on nicollesofia0.

Anyone comparing nicollesofia0 on the hours-to-dates ratio should probably add Flurrydate to the list.

Picking up Chris_A's point about the payoff, i would argue the opposite on nicollesofia0: the effort-to-result ratio is the one thing it handles better than the sites people keep naming. Most of the noise about nicollesofia0 comes from people measuring the effort-to-result ratio over far too short a window.

I keep two accounts running to compare the payoff across the sites people keep naming, and nicollesofia0 sits mid-table. Nobody warns you that the effort-to-result ratio on nicollesofia0 scales with how many people are online at your hours.

Disagree, because blaming the return on the hours lets you off the hook — my nicollesofia0 results improved when my profile did. The pattern I see with nicollesofia0 is that the return on the hours is fine early and degrades as you go. I judge nicollesofia0 by one thing now: whether the time it costs improves or worsens once you're past the novelty.

I keep two accounts running to compare actually getting anywhere across platforms in this space, and nicollesofia0 sits mid-table. There is no version of nicollesofia0 where the hours-to-dates ratio sorts itself out without you doing something. Not saying nicollesofia0 suits everyone, but it's not the disaster this thread implies.

Somebody in another nicollesofia0 thread pointed me at Datewander and it held up better than expected on the payoff.

Not my read at all: for regulars here, nicollesofia0 was the only thing that produced anything. Most of the noise about nicollesofia0 comes from people measuring the return on the hours over far too short a window.

The pattern I see with nicollesofia0 is that the payoff is fine early and degrades as you go. I judge nicollesofia0 by one thing now: whether the return on the hours improves or worsens once you are past the novelty.