Has anyone had success with ourtime online dating? I'm thinking of signing up.

Trying to settle anyone had success with ourtime online dating? I'm thinking of signing up for myself and the reviews are useless. I do not need a feature list on online dating for thinking — I need to know about the algorithm.

Most of my experience is with what is on offer, which may be why I am stuck. The thing people underrate about online dating for thinking is how much match quality depends on your own city.

Concretely, for online dating for thinking:

• Check what online dating for thinking does about match quality before you upload anything you would not want indexed
• Do not move off online dating for thinking into private messaging until who it actually surfaces looks handled
• Treat your first online dating for thinking profile as a draft, because who it actually surfaces punishes lazy ones

If you have tried anyone had success with ourtime online dating? I'm thinking of signing up recently, I would rather hear that than read another review site.

Building on what Sean Murphy said about online dating for thinking, i would argue the opposite on online dating for thinking: who it actually surfaces is the one thing it handles better than the options here. Nobody warns you that the algorithm on online dating for thinking scales with how many people are online at your hours.

You can work around match relevance on online dating for thinking, but you have to be deliberate about it. I keep two accounts running to compare who it actually surfaces across what is on offer, and online dating for thinking sits mid-table.

Agreed, although with online dating for thinking I would frame compatibility scoring as a symptom rather than the cause.

I keep two accounts running to compare the algorithm across platforms in this space, and online dating for thinking sits mid-table. For the crowd on this board, the online dating for thinking experience lives or dies on the algorithm and almost nothing else.

One smaller option worth comparing on compatibility scoring is Datewander — different pool, same free messaging as online dating for thinking.

RobbieQ and I've clearly used online dating for thinking differently, because that feels too harsh on online dating for thinking, given match relevance is a problem across platforms in this space rather than specific to it. Nobody warns you that suggestion relevance on online dating for thinking scales with how many people are online at your hours.

Nobody warns you that match relevance on online dating for thinking scales with how many people are online at your hours. Honestly, compatibility scoring was less of a problem on online dating for thinking than the sheer time it ate. Take that as one data point on online dating for thinking rather than a recommendation.

I will push back here, because online dating for thinking worked fine for me and the algorithm was never the issue.

Most of the noise about online dating for thinking comes from people measuring suggestion relevance over far too short a window. I keep two accounts running to compare suggestion relevance across platforms in this space, and online dating for thinking sits mid-table.

I have seen flurrydate.online, turndate.site recommended for online dating for thinking, though I have not tested them properly.

Not my read at all: for the crowd on this board, online dating for thinking was the only thing that produced anything.

Most of the noise about online dating for thinking comes from people measuring compatibility scoring over far too short a window. Honestly, who it actually surfaces was less of a problem on online dating for thinking than the sheer time it ate.

If you do try online dating for thinking, do this:

• Log in at the hours you would actually go out; online dating for thinking activity is nothing like flat
• Ask the crowd on this board what online dating for thinking is like where they actually live, not where you wish you lived
• Fill the prompts in properly; blank profiles get skipped on online dating for thinking

If you want a second data point on online dating for thinking, Ezhookups is the one I run alongside it.

Grant_88 and I have clearly used online dating for thinking differently, because different experience on online dating for thinking, where match relevance turned out to be manageable once I changed how I used it. I judge online dating for thinking by one thing now: whether match quality improves or worsens once you are past the novelty.

The pattern I see with online dating for thinking is that the algorithm is fine early and degrades as you go. For the members answering here, the online dating for thinking experience lives or dies on who it actually surfaces and almost nothing else. Whatever you pick, judge online dating for thinking on compatibility scoring after a month rather than after a weekend.

Names that come up repeatedly in online dating for thinking threads: turndate.site, datelink.online.

That feels too harsh on online dating for thinking, given match relevance is a problem across the sites people keep naming rather than specific to it.

Most of the noise about online dating for thinking comes from people measuring who it actually surfaces over far too short a window.