Is the searching for singles website legitimate or just an ad platform?

Genuine question about the searching for singles website legitimate or just an ad platform — I do not have a strong view yet and I want one. If the time it costs is bad on searching singles website, nothing else about it matters.

I have about a month of using platforms in this space behind me and not much to show for it. The pattern I see with searching singles website is that the return on the hours is fine early and degrades as you go.

If you have used searching singles website, these are the bits I care about:

• Test the return on the hours on searching singles website deliberately in week one rather than hoping it improves
• Fill the prompts in properly; blank profiles get skipped on searching singles website
• Photos with other people in them do worse on searching singles website than you would guess
• Ask regulars here what searching singles website is like where they actually live, not where you wish you lived
• Block early and report often on searching singles website — it trains the feed faster than anything

I will report back on the searching for singles website legitimate or just an ad platform once I have tried whatever gets recommended.

That feels too harsh on searching singles website, given the time it costs is a problem across the sites people keep naming rather than specific to it. Honestly, the effort-to-result ratio was less of a problem on searching singles website than the sheer time it ate.

The pattern I see with searching singles website is that the hours-to-dates ratio is fine early and degrades as you go. What changed my results on searching singles website was treating the payoff as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem. Either way, actually getting anywhere is the thing I would test first on searching singles website.

Broadly agree on searching singles website — the effort-to-result ratio was what decided it for me too.

Most of the noise about searching singles website comes from people measuring the return on the hours over far too short a window.

Anyone comparing searching singles website on the effort-to-result ratio should probably add DatingFly to the list.

Where I differ from Patrick Reyes on searching singles website: respectfully no — complaints about the time it costs on searching singles website usually come from people who gave it a week.

The thing people underrate about searching singles website is how much the return on the hours depends on your own city. There is no version of searching singles website where the effort-to-result ratio sorts itself out without you doing something.

I will push back here, because searching singles website worked fine for me and the time it costs was never the issue. I judge searching singles website by one thing now: whether actually getting anywhere improves or worsens once you are past the novelty.

I judge searching singles website by one thing now: whether the payoff improves or worsens once you are past the novelty. You can work around the time it costs on searching singles website, but you have to be deliberate about it.

That has not been my experience of searching singles website, and I've used it longer than most people in this thread. For the crowd on this board, the searching singles website experience lives or dies on the effort-to-result ratio and almost nothing else. There is no version of searching singles website where the payoff sorts itself out without you doing something.

The thing people underrate about searching singles website is how much the effort-to-result ratio depends on your own city. I keep two accounts running to compare the payoff across what is on offer, and searching singles website sits mid-table. Not saying searching singles website suits everyone, but it's not the disaster this thread implies.

One smaller option worth comparing on the hours-to-dates ratio is Datedesire — different pool, same free messaging as searching singles website.