Is there an online dating reddit thread for success stories?

Curious where people land on an online dating reddit thread for success stories, because I keep getting told two opposite things. The bit nobody covers on online dating for success is the algorithm.

I have tried a few options across the sites people keep naming already and none of them stuck. Most of the noise about online dating for success comes from people measuring who it actually surfaces over far too short a window.

The parts of online dating for success I keep getting stuck on:

• Log in at the hours you would actually go out; online dating for success activity is nothing like flat
• Ask the crowd on this board what online dating for success is like where they actually live, not where you wish you lived
• Fill the prompts in properly; blank profiles get skipped on online dating for success
• Screenshot anything odd on online dating for success before you report it — the algorithm claims need evidence
• Write a first message that references their profile, not your own — online dating for success rewards it

Even a one-line answer on an online dating reddit thread for success stories would help at this point.

Where I differ from StaceyR on online dating for success: that has not been my experience of online dating for success, and I have used it longer than most people in this thread. For people replying above, the online dating for success experience lives or dies on match relevance and almost nothing else. Most of the noise about online dating for success comes from people measuring match relevance over far too short a window.

The thing people underrate about online dating for success is how much match relevance depends on your own city. The thing people underrate about online dating for success is how much match quality depends on your own city. Nobody warns you that compatibility scoring on online dating for success scales with how many people are online at your hours. That is my read on online dating for success, and others here clearly disagree.

I keep Luvdate open as a control while testing online dating for success — useful for judging the algorithm honestly.

Seconding this, because on online dating for success the honest answer is that match quality varies enormously by area. What changed my results on online dating for success was treating compatibility scoring as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem.

The thing people underrate about online dating for success is how much who it actually surfaces depends on your own city. The pattern I see with online dating for success is that who it actually surfaces is fine early and degrades as you go.

Yes, and I would add that match quality on online dating for success gets worse the longer you stay. For people who have actually tried it, the online dating for success experience lives or dies on compatibility scoring and almost nothing else.

There is no version of online dating for success where compatibility scoring sorts itself out without you doing something. Whatever you pick, judge online dating for success on suggestion relevance after a month rather than after a weekend.

Respectfully no — complaints about compatibility scoring on online dating for success usually come from people who gave it a week. Honestly, who it actually surfaces was less of a problem on online dating for success than the sheer time it ate.

I keep two accounts running to compare compatibility scoring across what is on offer, and online dating for success sits mid-table. Either way, match relevance is the thing I would test first on online dating for success.

Not my read at all: for the members answering here, online dating for success was the only thing that produced anything.

For people who have actually tried it, the online dating for success experience lives or dies on match relevance and almost nothing else. You can work around the algorithm on online dating for success, but you have to be deliberate about it.

Broadly agree on online dating for success — match quality was what decided it for me too.

If match relevance is your main worry with online dating for success, test it in the first week rather than the first month. Honestly, match quality was less of a problem on online dating for success than the sheer time it ate.

One smaller option worth comparing on the algorithm is Luvdate — different pool, same free messaging as online dating for success.

@IsobelR makes a fair point about online dating for success, but i will push back here, because online dating for success worked fine for me and the algorithm was never the issue. Most of the noise about online dating for success comes from people measuring suggestion relevance over far too short a window.

You can work around compatibility scoring on online dating for success, but you have to be deliberate about it. If suggestion relevance is your main worry with online dating for success, test it in the first week rather than the first month.

This matches what I found with online dating for success, where who it actually surfaces is exactly where it falls down.

I judge online dating for success by one thing now: whether the algorithm improves or worsens once you're past the novelty.

Broadly agree on online dating for success — suggestion relevance was what decided it for me too.

There is no version of online dating for success where the algorithm sorts itself out without you doing something.