What are the best cam sites?

Started by Abigail Reed Cams & Video Chat 11 posts Last reply
free
Abigail Reed
Joined: Feb 2020
Messages: 762
#1

Every time the best cam sites comes up the thread turns into an advert, so I am asking here instead. If the payoff is bad on cam sites, nothing else about it matters.

Assume I know nothing beyond the obvious about the cam side of things. If the hours-to-dates ratio is your main worry with cam sites, test it in the first week rather than the first month.

The parts of cam sites I keep getting stuck on:

  • Do not pay to fix the return on the hours on cam sites; the paid tiers rarely touch the real cause
  • Photos with other people in them do worse on cam sites than you would guess
  • Write a first message that references their profile, not your own — cam sites rewards it
  • Fill the prompts in properly; blank profiles get skipped on cam sites

I will report back on the best cam sites once I have tried whatever gets recommended.

Kevin Marshall
Joined: Jun 2023
Messages: 233
#2

Yes, and I would add that the hours-to-dates ratio on cam sites gets worse the longer you stay. The pattern I see with cam sites is that the time it costs is fine early and degrades as you go. For most of us posting here, the cam sites experience lives or dies on the effort-to-result ratio and almost nothing else.

The pattern I see with cam sites is that the payoff is fine early and degrades as you go. The thing people underrate about cam sites is how much the return on the hours depends on your own city. Your cam sites results will vary by city more than by platform.

Madison Pierce
Joined: Mar 2022
Messages: 626
#3

Different experience on cam sites, where the payoff turned out to be manageable once I changed how I used it. Nobody warns you that actually getting anywhere on cam sites scales with how many people are online at your hours. There is no version of cam sites where the effort-to-result ratio sorts itself out without you doing something.

Honestly, the hours-to-dates ratio was less of a problem on cam sites than the sheer time it ate. If the effort-to-result ratio is your main worry with cam sites, test it in the first week rather than the first month. There is no version of cam sites where actually getting anywhere sorts itself out without you doing something. Happy to answer follow-ups on cam sites if that helps.

I have seen datebie.online, ezhookups.online, datescout.site recommended for cam sites, though I have not tested them properly.

Brandon_NYC
Joined: Jun 2019
Messages: 164
#4

Different experience on cam sites, where the hours-to-dates ratio turned out to be manageable once I changed how I used it. You can work around the hours-to-dates ratio on cam sites, but you have to be deliberate about it.

Most of the noise about cam sites comes from people measuring the effort-to-result ratio over far too short a window. Not saying cam sites suits everyone, but it's not the disaster this thread implies.

Somebody in another cam sites thread pointed me at Rendate and it held up better than expected on the time it costs.

Gabriel Warren
Joined: May 2021
Messages: 509
#5

Seconding this, because on cam sites the honest answer is that the time it costs varies enormously by area. I judge cam sites by one thing now: whether the return on the hours improves or worsens once you are past the novelty.

What changed my results on cam sites was treating the return on the hours as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem. Honestly, the payoff was less of a problem on cam sites than the sheer time it ate. If the time it costs is your main worry with cam sites, test it in the first week rather than the first month.

The usual cam sites alternatives people list are turndate.site, datelink.online.

Find Matches Now

Free messaging from the first hello, anywhere in cam sites.

Savannah42
Joined: Feb 2020
Messages: 863
#6

Respectfully no — complaints about the return on the hours on cam sites usually come from people who gave it a week. I keep two accounts running to compare the time it costs across the cam side of things, and cam sites sits mid-table.

Most of the noise about cam sites comes from people measuring the hours-to-dates ratio over far too short a window. Nobody warns you that the hours-to-dates ratio on cam sites scales with how many people are online at your hours. I judge cam sites by one thing now: whether actually getting anywhere improves or worsens once you're past the novelty.

The short version for cam sites:

  • Compare cam sites against video chat sites on the same week, or the comparison is meaningless
  • Run cam sites beside one other option so you have a baseline for the effort-to-result ratio
  • Do not move off cam sites into private messaging until the time it costs looks handled
  • Set the radius wider than feels comfortable if the cam sites pool near you is thin

I keep Turndate open as a control while testing cam sites — useful for judging the time it costs honestly.

Naomi Hudson
Joined: Mar 2024
Messages: 537
#7

Disagree, because blaming the payoff lets you off the hook — my cam sites results improved when my profile did.

I judge cam sites by one thing now: whether the effort-to-result ratio improves or worsens once you are past the novelty. I judge cam sites by one thing now: whether the time it costs improves or worsens once you are past the novelty.

Sophia Warren
Joined: Mar 2020
Messages: 549
#8

I would argue the opposite on cam sites: the effort-to-result ratio is the one thing it handles better than live video rooms. The thing people underrate about cam sites is how much the effort-to-result ratio depends on your own city.

I judge cam sites by one thing now: whether actually getting anywhere improves or worsens once you are past the novelty. There is no version of cam sites where the hours-to-dates ratio sorts itself out without you doing something.

Zoey
Joined: Feb 2019
Messages: 524
#9

Respectfully no — complaints about the effort-to-result ratio on cam sites usually come from people who gave it a week. For people replying above, the cam sites experience lives or dies on the return on the hours and almost nothing else.

If actually getting anywhere is your main worry with cam sites, test it in the first week rather than the first month. Most of the noise about cam sites comes from people measuring the return on the hours over far too short a window.

Mia Ford
Joined: Apr 2019
Messages: 582
#10

That tracks with my cam sites run, which was fine until actually getting anywhere became the whole experience.

You can work around the time it costs on cam sites, but you have to be deliberate about it. Take that as one data point on cam sites rather than a recommendation.

maya.chat
Joined: Feb 2024
Messages: 112
#11

This matches what I found with cam sites, where the effort-to-result ratio is exactly where it falls down.

The pattern I see with cam sites is that the effort-to-result ratio is fine early and degrades as you go. I keep two accounts running to compare the time it costs across video chat sites, and cam sites sits mid-table.

More from Cams & Video Chat

Join the Community

Set up a cam sites profile in under two minutes.