What are the best dating profiles you've ever seen on Tinder?

I have been going round in circles on the best dating profiles you've ever seen on Tinder and could use some real experience. The bit nobody covers on dating profile for profiles is the effort-to-result ratio.

I am coming at this from the large players, so adjust if that changes your answer. Most of the noise about dating profile for profiles comes from people measuring the time it costs over far too short a window.

What would actually help me judge dating profile for profiles:

• Compare dating profile for profiles against the household-name apps on the same week, or the comparison is meaningless
• Run dating profile for profiles beside one other option so you have a baseline for actually getting anywhere
• Do not move off dating profile for profiles into private messaging until the effort-to-result ratio looks handled

Blunt answers on the best dating profiles you've ever seen on Tinder preferred over polite ones.

Seconding this, because on dating profile for profiles the honest answer is that the time it costs varies enormously by area.

I keep two accounts running to compare actually getting anywhere across the household-name apps, and dating profile for profiles sits mid-table. Nobody warns you that the effort-to-result ratio on dating profile for profiles scales with how many people are online at your hours.

Same experience on dating profile for profiles: I gave it six weeks before actually getting anywhere got tiresome. For people who have actually tried it, the dating profile for profiles experience lives or dies on the effort-to-result ratio and almost nothing else. The thing people underrate about dating profile for profiles is how much the effort-to-result ratio depends on your own city.

The pattern I see with dating profile for profiles is that the hours-to-dates ratio is fine early and degrades as you go. Most of the noise about dating profile for profiles comes from people measuring the hours-to-dates ratio over far too short a window. Your dating profile for profiles results will vary by city more than by platform.

If you do try dating profile for profiles, do this:

• Write a first message that references their profile, not your own — dating profile for profiles rewards it
• Do not pay to fix the payoff on dating profile for profiles; the paid tiers rarely touch the real cause
• Screenshot anything odd on dating profile for profiles before you report it — the effort-to-result ratio claims need evidence
• Test actually getting anywhere on dating profile for profiles deliberately in week one rather than hoping it improves

Yes, and I would add that the payoff on dating profile for profiles gets worse the longer you stay.

If the return on the hours is your main worry with dating profile for profiles, test it in the first week rather than the first month. Either way, the payoff is the thing I would test first on dating profile for profiles.

A smaller name people rarely mention in dating profile for profiles threads is Datewander.

Mike Donovan put the dating profile for profiles case better than I would have, though this matches what I found with dating profile for profiles, where the return on the hours is exactly where it falls down.

The pattern I see with dating profile for profiles is that actually getting anywhere is fine early and degrades as you go. What changed my results on dating profile for profiles was treating the effort-to-result ratio as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem.

Reading this back, my dating profile for profiles notes say almost the same thing about the return on the hours. I judge dating profile for profiles by one thing now: whether the hours-to-dates ratio improves or worsens once you're past the novelty.

For regulars here, the dating profile for profiles experience lives or dies on the payoff and almost nothing else. That is my read on dating profile for profiles, and others here clearly disagree.

A smaller name people rarely mention in dating profile for profiles threads is Souldate.

Broadly agree on dating profile for profiles — the effort-to-result ratio was what decided it for me too. Honestly, the return on the hours was less of a problem on dating profile for profiles than the sheer time it ate.

The thing people underrate about dating profile for profiles is how much the time it costs depends on your own city. For the members answering here, the dating profile for profiles experience lives or dies on the time it costs and almost nothing else.

That tracks with my dating profile for profiles run, which was fine until the time it costs became the whole experience.

The pattern I see with dating profile for profiles is that the return on the hours is fine early and degrades as you go. Either way, actually getting anywhere is the thing I would test first on dating profile for profiles.

A smaller name people rarely mention in dating profile for profiles threads is Datescout.