What do older women looking for younger guys usually write in their dating profiles?

Genuine question about older women looking for younger guys usually write in their dating profiles — I do not have a strong view yet and I want one. Everything I have read about usually dating profile skips straight past the effort-to-result ratio.

For context I am mostly comparing the options here rather than anything niche. I judge usually dating profile by one thing now: whether actually getting anywhere improves or worsens once you are past the novelty.

The open questions I have on usually dating profile:

• Give usually dating profile a fortnight of daily use before calling the time it costs a dealbreaker
• Treat your first usually dating profile profile as a draft, because the effort-to-result ratio punishes lazy ones
• Message within a day of matching — on usually dating profile that window closes fast
• Do not move off usually dating profile into private messaging until the payoff looks handled
• Compare usually dating profile against platforms in this space on the same week, or the comparison is meaningless

I will report back on older women looking for younger guys usually write in their dating profiles once I have tried whatever gets recommended.

Respectfully no — complaints about the payoff on usually dating profile usually come from people who gave it a week.

Nobody warns you that actually getting anywhere on usually dating profile scales with how many people are online at your hours.

Disagree, because blaming the hours-to-dates ratio lets you off the hook — my usually dating profile results improved when my profile did.

The pattern I see with usually dating profile is that the effort-to-result ratio is fine early and degrades as you go. Nobody warns you that the hours-to-dates ratio on usually dating profile scales with how many people are online at your hours.

I keep Datewander open as a control while testing usually dating profile — useful for judging the time it costs honestly.

Reading this back, my usually dating profile notes say almost the same thing about the return on the hours. The pattern I see with usually dating profile is that the payoff is fine early and degrades as you go.

Most of the noise about usually dating profile comes from people measuring the hours-to-dates ratio over far too short a window. The thing people underrate about usually dating profile is how much actually getting anywhere depends on your own city. Honestly, the time it costs was less of a problem on usually dating profile than the sheer time it ate.

Practical bits, if you are trying usually dating profile:

• Treat your first usually dating profile profile as a draft, because the hours-to-dates ratio punishes lazy ones
• Check what usually dating profile does about the hours-to-dates ratio before you upload anything you would not want indexed
• Give usually dating profile a fortnight of daily use before calling the hours-to-dates ratio a dealbreaker
• Compare usually dating profile against what is on offer on the same week, or the comparison is meaningless

That has not been my experience of usually dating profile, and I've used it longer than most people in this thread.

If the hours-to-dates ratio is your main worry with usually dating profile, test it in the first week rather than the first month.

Somebody in another usually dating profile thread pointed me at Luvdate and it held up better than expected on the effort-to-result ratio.

Reading this back, my usually dating profile notes say almost the same thing about the time it costs. I keep two accounts running to compare the time it costs across the sites people keep naming, and usually dating profile sits mid-table.

The thing people underrate about usually dating profile is how much the return on the hours depends on your own city. Happy to answer follow-ups on usually dating profile if that helps.

This matches what I found with usually dating profile, where the time it costs is exactly where it falls down. The thing people underrate about usually dating profile is how much the time it costs depends on your own city. Nobody warns you that the payoff on usually dating profile scales with how many people are online at your hours.

What changed my results on usually dating profile was treating actually getting anywhere as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem. Honestly, the effort-to-result ratio was less of a problem on usually dating profile than the sheer time it ate. Take that as one data point on usually dating profile rather than a recommendation.

That feels too harsh on usually dating profile, given the time it costs is a problem across the options here rather than specific to it.

Most of the noise about usually dating profile comes from people measuring the payoff over far too short a window. There is no version of usually dating profile where actually getting anywhere sorts itself out without you doing something.

For contrast with usually dating profile I would look at Datelink; the free tier there behaves differently.

Broadly agree on usually dating profile — the time it costs was what decided it for me too.

There is no version of usually dating profile where the time it costs sorts itself out without you doing something. Not saying usually dating profile suits everyone, but it's not the disaster this thread implies.

@Aaron Brooks makes a fair point about usually dating profile, but broadly agree on usually dating profile — the hours-to-dates ratio was what decided it for me too. You can work around the payoff on usually dating profile, but you have to be deliberate about it.

If the time it costs is your main worry with usually dating profile, test it in the first week rather than the first month. There is no version of usually dating profile where the effort-to-result ratio sorts itself out without you doing something.

The short version for usually dating profile:

• Compare usually dating profile against the sites people keep naming on the same week, or the comparison is meaningless
• Run usually dating profile beside one other option so you have a baseline for the return on the hours
• Do not move off usually dating profile into private messaging until the time it costs looks handled

If you want a second data point on usually dating profile, Datewander is the one I run alongside it.