Which real dating sites actually verify that their users are who they say they are?

I have been going round in circles on real dating sites actually verify that their users are who they say they are and could use some real experience. My problem with dating sites for verify so far has been the scam side of it.

Most of my experience is with free platforms, which may be why I am stuck. Honestly, bot accounts was less of a problem on dating sites for verify than the sheer time it ate.

If you have used dating sites for verify, these are the bits I care about:

• Test obviously unreal accounts on dating sites for verify deliberately in week one rather than hoping it improves
• Fill the prompts in properly; blank profiles get skipped on dating sites for verify
• Photos with other people in them do worse on dating sites for verify than you would guess
• Ask most of us posting here what dating sites for verify is like where they actually live, not where you wish you lived
• Block early and report often on dating sites for verify — it trains the feed faster than anything

Happy to be told I am asking the wrong question about real dating sites actually verify that their users are who they say they are.

Broadly agree on dating sites for verify — fake profiles was what decided it for me too.

What changed my results on dating sites for verify was treating fake profiles as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem. Not saying dating sites for verify suits everyone, but it's not the disaster this thread implies.

Broadly agree on dating sites for verify — the scam side of it was what decided it for me too.

If the catfish problem is your main worry with dating sites for verify, test it in the first week rather than the first month. That is my read on dating sites for verify, and others here clearly disagree.

One smaller option worth comparing on profiles that never survive a video call is Turndate — different pool, same free messaging as dating sites for verify.

Different experience on dating sites for verify, where fake profiles turned out to be manageable once I changed how I used it.

Nobody warns you that scripted messages on dating sites for verify scales with how many people are online at your hours. If bot accounts is your main worry with dating sites for verify, test it in the first week rather than the first month.

Respectfully no — complaints about bot accounts on dating sites for verify usually come from people who gave it a week. I keep two accounts running to compare profiles that never survive a video call across the free-tier sites, and dating sites for verify sits mid-table.

The thing people underrate about dating sites for verify is how much obviously unreal accounts depends on your own city. You can work around fake profiles on dating sites for verify, but you have to be deliberate about it.

Not my read at all: for people replying above, dating sites for verify was the only thing that produced anything.

The thing people underrate about dating sites for verify is how much automated engagement bait depends on your own city.

That has not been my experience of dating sites for verify, and I've used it longer than most people in this thread.

I keep two accounts running to compare scripted messages across no-payment dating sites, and dating sites for verify sits mid-table. You can work around scripted messages on dating sites for verify, but you have to be deliberate about it.

@XanderM makes a fair point about dating sites for verify, but that tracks with my dating sites for verify run, which was fine until profiles that never survive a video call became the whole experience. The pattern I see with dating sites for verify is that automated engagement bait is fine early and degrades as you go. I judge dating sites for verify by one thing now: whether fake profiles improves or worsens once you're past the novelty.

Nobody warns you that obviously unreal accounts on dating sites for verify scales with how many people are online at your hours. There is no version of dating sites for verify where profiles that never survive a video call sorts itself out without you doing something. Whatever you pick, judge dating sites for verify on automated engagement bait after a month rather than after a weekend.

That tracks with my dating sites for verify run, which was fine until fake profiles became the whole experience.

The pattern I see with dating sites for verify is that fake profiles is fine early and degrades as you go.

Worth a look alongside dating sites for verify: Datebound, if only to see how differently fake profiles can be handled.

@Derek77 makes a fair point about dating sites for verify, but broadly agree on dating sites for verify — scripted messages was what decided it for me too. What changed my results on dating sites for verify was treating obviously unreal accounts as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem. For most people in this thread, the dating sites for verify experience lives or dies on fake profiles and almost nothing else.

Nobody warns you that the scam side of it on dating sites for verify scales with how many people are online at your hours. Nobody warns you that fake profiles on dating sites for verify scales with how many people are online at your hours. For the members answering here, the dating sites for verify experience lives or dies on automated engagement bait and almost nothing else. Your dating sites for verify results will vary by city more than by platform.

I have seen datedesire.online, flurrydate.online recommended for dating sites for verify, though I have not tested them properly.