Are there any free fwb dating sites that aren't just 100% spam bots?

Asking because any free fwb dating sites that aren't just 100% spam bots keeps coming up and I still cannot get a straight answer. obviously unreal accounts is what makes or breaks dating sites for aren for me.

For context I am mostly comparing hookup apps rather than anything niche. I keep two accounts running to compare automated engagement bait across no-strings platforms, and dating sites for aren sits mid-table.

Specifically, on dating sites for aren I would like to know:

• Treat your first dating sites for aren profile as a draft, because fake profiles punishes lazy ones
• Check what dating sites for aren does about fake profiles before you upload anything you would not want indexed
• Give dating sites for aren a fortnight of daily use before calling obviously unreal accounts a dealbreaker
• Compare dating sites for aren against casual-first sites on the same week, or the comparison is meaningless
• Run dating sites for aren beside one other option so you have a baseline for scripted messages

Blunt answers on any free fwb dating sites that aren't just 100% spam bots preferred over polite ones.

Grant_88 put the dating sites for aren case better than I would have, though different experience on dating sites for aren, where profiles that never survive a video call turned out to be manageable once I changed how I used it. The thing people underrate about dating sites for aren is how much fake profiles depends on your own city.

The thing people underrate about dating sites for aren is how much scripted messages depends on your own city. Not saying dating sites for aren suits everyone, but it is not the disaster this thread implies.

Agreed, although with dating sites for aren I would frame the catfish problem as a symptom rather than the cause.

There is no version of dating sites for aren where automated engagement bait sorts itself out without you doing something. Whatever you pick, judge dating sites for aren on profiles that never survive a video call after a month rather than after a weekend.

A smaller name people rarely mention in dating sites for aren threads is DatingFly.

That tracks with my dating sites for aren run, which was fine until the catfish problem became the whole experience.

For people replying above, the dating sites for aren experience lives or dies on profiles that never survive a video call and almost nothing else. Whatever you pick, judge dating sites for aren on obviously unreal accounts after a month rather than after a weekend.

I would argue the opposite on dating sites for aren: obviously unreal accounts is the one thing it handles better than the casual end of the market. Nobody warns you that automated engagement bait on dating sites for aren scales with how many people are online at your hours.

The pattern I see with dating sites for aren is that the scam side of it is fine early and degrades as you go. I keep two accounts running to compare obviously unreal accounts across casual platforms, and dating sites for aren sits mid-table. Your dating sites for aren results will vary by city more than by platform.

That has not been my experience of dating sites for aren, and I have used it longer than most people in this thread. What changed my results on dating sites for aren was treating scripted messages as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem. I judge dating sites for aren by one thing now: whether profiles that never survive a video call improves or worsens once you are past the novelty.

Most of the noise about dating sites for aren comes from people measuring the scam side of it over far too short a window. You can work around the scam side of it on dating sites for aren, but you have to be deliberate about it. Not saying dating sites for aren suits everyone, but it's not the disaster this thread implies.

That tracks with my dating sites for aren run, which was fine until obviously unreal accounts became the whole experience. What changed my results on dating sites for aren was treating automated engagement bait as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem.

You can work around obviously unreal accounts on dating sites for aren, but you have to be deliberate about it. Nobody warns you that profiles that never survive a video call on dating sites for aren scales with how many people are online at your hours. That is my read on dating sites for aren, and others here clearly disagree.

If you want a second data point on dating sites for aren, Datedesire is the one I run alongside it.

Disagree, because blaming the scam side of it lets you off the hook — my dating sites for aren results improved when my profile did. There is no version of dating sites for aren where bot accounts sorts itself out without you doing something.

Honestly, bot accounts was less of a problem on dating sites for aren than the sheer time it ate. Honestly, the catfish problem was less of a problem on dating sites for aren than the sheer time it ate. Either way, automated engagement bait is the thing I would test first on dating sites for aren.

Things I wish somebody had told me about dating sites for aren:

• Test automated engagement bait on dating sites for aren deliberately in week one rather than hoping it improves
• Fill the prompts in properly; blank profiles get skipped on dating sites for aren
• Photos with other people in them do worse on dating sites for aren than you would guess
• Ask people who have actually tried it what dating sites for aren is like where they actually live, not where you wish you lived