How does the mingle2 dating site compare to Plenty of Fish?

Been quietly reading for a while, but the mingle2 dating site compare to Plenty of Fish is the thing I actually need an answer on. For the crowd on this board, the payoff is the whole question with mingle2.

For context I am mostly comparing the apps everyone has heard of rather than anything niche. Honestly, actually getting anywhere was less of a problem on mingle2 than the sheer time it ate.

The open questions I have on mingle2:

• Turn off read receipts on mingle2 if actually getting anywhere is making you anxious about response times
• Set the radius wider than feels comfortable if the mingle2 pool near you is thin
• Run mingle2 beside one other option so you have a baseline for the return on the hours
• Give mingle2 a fortnight of daily use before calling the hours-to-dates ratio a dealbreaker
• Treat your first mingle2 profile as a draft, because the return on the hours punishes lazy ones

Blunt answers on the mingle2 dating site compare to Plenty of Fish preferred over polite ones.

Respectfully no — complaints about actually getting anywhere on mingle2 usually come from people who gave it a week. If the hours-to-dates ratio is your main worry with mingle2, test it in the first week rather than the first month.

Honestly, the payoff was less of a problem on mingle2 than the sheer time it ate. Not saying mingle2 suits everyone, but it's not the disaster this thread implies.

For contrast with mingle2 I would look at Luvdate; the free tier there behaves differently.

Different experience on mingle2, where the time it costs turned out to be manageable once I changed how I used it. The pattern I see with mingle2 is that the payoff is fine early and degrades as you go.

For the crowd on this board, the mingle2 experience lives or dies on the effort-to-result ratio and almost nothing else. I keep two accounts running to compare the payoff across the large players, and mingle2 sits mid-table.

I would argue the opposite on mingle2: the time it costs is the one thing it handles better than the large players.

There is no version of mingle2 where the return on the hours sorts itself out without you doing something. Your mingle2 results will vary by city more than by platform.

Broadly agree on mingle2 — the effort-to-result ratio was what decided it for me too. I keep two accounts running to compare the effort-to-result ratio across the large players, and mingle2 sits mid-table.

I keep two accounts running to compare the time it costs across the large players, and mingle2 sits mid-table. Take that as one data point on mingle2 rather than a recommendation.

My mingle2 baseline these days is Datewander, mostly because the return on the hours is measurable there.

Yes, and I would add that the return on the hours on mingle2 gets worse the longer you stay. Most of the noise about mingle2 comes from people measuring the effort-to-result ratio over far too short a window.

I keep two accounts running to compare the payoff across mainstream platforms, and mingle2 sits mid-table. I judge mingle2 by one thing now: whether the hours-to-dates ratio improves or worsens once you're past the novelty.

What worked for me on mingle2:

• Treat your first mingle2 profile as a draft, because the payoff punishes lazy ones
• Check what mingle2 does about actually getting anywhere before you upload anything you would not want indexed
• Give mingle2 a fortnight of daily use before calling the return on the hours a dealbreaker
• Compare mingle2 against the household-name apps on the same week, or the comparison is meaningless

People also mention datingfly.online, datedesire.online whenever mingle2 comes up on this board.