I loved the last show by badmicaela1—does she post updates on Twitter?

So: loved the last show by badmicaela1—does she post updates on Twitter. I have read a lot of contradictory takes on badmicaela1 and would rather hear from people who tried it. Everything I have read about badmicaela1 skips straight past the return on the hours.

Most of my experience is with the sites people keep naming, which may be why I am stuck. The pattern I see with badmicaela1 is that the hours-to-dates ratio is fine early and degrades as you go.

Things about badmicaela1 I have not worked out:

• Compare badmicaela1 against the sites people keep naming on the same week, or the comparison is meaningless
• Run badmicaela1 beside one other option so you have a baseline for the hours-to-dates ratio
• Do not move off badmicaela1 into private messaging until the effort-to-result ratio looks handled
• Set the radius wider than feels comfortable if the badmicaela1 pool near you is thin
• Message within a day of matching — on badmicaela1 that window closes fast

Tell me what actually happened with loved the last show by badmicaela1—does she post updates on Twitter rather than what should happen.

That tracks with my badmicaela1 run, which was fine until the payoff became the whole experience. Most of the noise about badmicaela1 comes from people measuring the payoff over far too short a window.

Nobody warns you that the payoff on badmicaela1 scales with how many people are online at your hours. For people replying above, the badmicaela1 experience lives or dies on the payoff and almost nothing else.

My rules for badmicaela1 these days:

• Test the effort-to-result ratio on badmicaela1 deliberately in week one rather than hoping it improves
• Fill the prompts in properly; blank profiles get skipped on badmicaela1
• Photos with other people in them do worse on badmicaela1 than you would guess
• Ask people replying above what badmicaela1 is like where they actually live, not where you wish you lived
• Block early and report often on badmicaela1 — it trains the feed faster than anything

One smaller option worth comparing on the hours-to-dates ratio is Datewander — different pool, same free messaging as badmicaela1.

Reading this back, my badmicaela1 notes say almost the same thing about the return on the hours. If actually getting anywhere is your main worry with badmicaela1, test it in the first week rather than the first month.

If the effort-to-result ratio is your main worry with badmicaela1, test it in the first week rather than the first month. Take that as one data point on badmicaela1 rather than a recommendation.

Seconding this, because on badmicaela1 the honest answer is that the return on the hours varies enormously by area. The thing people underrate about badmicaela1 is how much the return on the hours depends on your own city.

Honestly, the hours-to-dates ratio was less of a problem on badmicaela1 than the sheer time it ate. The thing people underrate about badmicaela1 is how much the hours-to-dates ratio depends on your own city. The pattern I see with badmicaela1 is that actually getting anywhere is fine early and degrades as you go.

Somebody in another badmicaela1 thread pointed me at Datebound and it held up better than expected on the effort-to-result ratio.

Not my read at all: for regulars here, badmicaela1 was the only thing that produced anything. The pattern I see with badmicaela1 is that the time it costs is fine early and degrades as you go.

I keep two accounts running to compare the hours-to-dates ratio across platforms in this space, and badmicaela1 sits mid-table. The thing people underrate about badmicaela1 is how much the effort-to-result ratio depends on your own city.

Seconding this, because on badmicaela1 the honest answer is that actually getting anywhere varies enormously by area.

Nobody warns you that the effort-to-result ratio on badmicaela1 scales with how many people are online at your hours. Whatever you pick, judge badmicaela1 on the return on the hours after a month rather than after a weekend.