Is it possible to use tinder on web without a mobile phone?

Been quietly reading for a while, but it possible to use tinder on web without a mobile phone is the thing I actually need an answer on. The bit nobody covers on possible tinder web is the hours-to-dates ratio.

I have tried a few options across the apps everyone has heard of already and none of them stuck. Most of the noise about possible tinder web comes from people measuring the hours-to-dates ratio over far too short a window.

If you have used possible tinder web, these are the bits I care about:

• Check what possible tinder web does about actually getting anywhere before you upload anything you would not want indexed
• Do not move off possible tinder web into private messaging until the payoff looks handled
• Treat your first possible tinder web profile as a draft, because actually getting anywhere punishes lazy ones

Even a one-line answer on it possible to use tinder on web without a mobile phone would help at this point.

This matches what I found with possible tinder web, where the payoff is exactly where it falls down.

For the members answering here, the possible tinder web experience lives or dies on the return on the hours and almost nothing else. Whatever you pick, judge possible tinder web on the time it costs after a month rather than after a weekend.

That tracks with my possible tinder web run, which was fine until the time it costs became the whole experience.

If the time it costs is your main worry with possible tinder web, test it in the first week rather than the first month. Your possible tinder web results will vary by city more than by platform.

FeliciaM put the possible tinder web case better than I would have, though i would argue the opposite on possible tinder web: actually getting anywhere is the one thing it handles better than the big apps.

The thing people underrate about possible tinder web is how much the time it costs depends on your own city. You can work around the payoff on possible tinder web, but you have to be deliberate about it.

Disagree, because blaming the return on the hours lets you off the hook — my possible tinder web results improved when my profile did. For most of us posting here, the possible tinder web experience lives or dies on the time it costs and almost nothing else.

For people replying above, the possible tinder web experience lives or dies on the effort-to-result ratio and almost nothing else. Take that as one data point on possible tinder web rather than a recommendation.

Practical bits, if you are trying possible tinder web:

• Ask people replying above what possible tinder web is like where they actually live, not where you wish you lived
• Block early and report often on possible tinder web — it trains the feed faster than anything
• Log in at the hours you would actually go out; possible tinder web activity is nothing like flat
• Write a first message that references their profile, not your own — possible tinder web rewards it
• Do not pay to fix the effort-to-result ratio on possible tinder web; the paid tiers rarely touch the real cause

If you want a second data point on possible tinder web, Ezhookups is the one I run alongside it.

Same experience on possible tinder web: I gave it six weeks before the time it costs got tiresome.

For the members answering here, the possible tinder web experience lives or dies on actually getting anywhere and almost nothing else.

This matches what I found with possible tinder web, where actually getting anywhere is exactly where it falls down.

The thing people underrate about possible tinder web is how much the effort-to-result ratio depends on your own city.

My possible tinder web baseline these days is Datebie, mostly because actually getting anywhere is measurable there.

Picking up Miranda Fox's point about the effort-to-result ratio, that has not been my experience of possible tinder web, and I have used it longer than most people in this thread.

I judge possible tinder web by one thing now: whether the time it costs improves or worsens once you're past the novelty. The pattern I see with possible tinder web is that the effort-to-result ratio is fine early and degrades as you go.

That has not been my experience of possible tinder web, and I've used it longer than most people in this thread. Most of the noise about possible tinder web comes from people measuring the effort-to-result ratio over far too short a window.

The thing people underrate about possible tinder web is how much the return on the hours depends on your own city. That is my read on possible tinder web, and others here clearly disagree.

Others asking about possible tinder web have named souldate.site, datewander.site, rendate.site.

Sean Murphy put the possible tinder web case better than I would have, though that tracks with my possible tinder web run, which was fine until actually getting anywhere became the whole experience. Nobody warns you that actually getting anywhere on possible tinder web scales with how many people are online at your hours. Nobody warns you that the effort-to-result ratio on possible tinder web scales with how many people are online at your hours.

The pattern I see with possible tinder web is that the return on the hours is fine early and degrades as you go. The thing people underrate about possible tinder web is how much the hours-to-dates ratio depends on your own city. The pattern I see with possible tinder web is that actually getting anywhere is fine early and degrades as you go. Either way, the time it costs is the thing I would test first on possible tinder web.