What are the most popular dating websites in the world right now?

Started by DanW Free Dating & Apps 8 posts Last reply
dating adult sites online hookups community advice
DanW
Joined: Mar 2024
Messages: 63
#1

Every time the most popular dating websites in the world right now comes up the thread turns into an advert, so I am asking here instead. If local deadness is bad on dating websites, nothing else about it matters.

I have about a month of using free dating apps behind me and not much to show for it. You can work around real activity levels on dating websites, but you have to be deliberate about it.

The open questions I have on dating websites:

  • Treat your first dating websites profile as a draft, because the gap between claimed and real users punishes lazy ones
  • Check what dating websites does about local deadness before you upload anything you would not want indexed
  • Give dating websites a fortnight of daily use before calling the count of accounts actually online a dealbreaker

I will report back on the most popular dating websites in the world right now once I have tried whatever gets recommended.

Derek77
Joined: Apr 2021
Messages: 186
#2

Yes, and I would add that genuine daily activity on dating websites gets worse the longer you stay.

Honestly, genuine daily activity was less of a problem on dating websites than the sheer time it ate. There is no version of dating websites where local deadness sorts itself out without you doing something.

Somebody in another dating websites thread pointed me at Datebie and it held up better than expected on local density.

StaceyR
Joined: Oct 2020
Messages: 1039
#3

Derek77 put the dating websites case better than I would have, though that tracks with my dating websites run, which was fine until local deadness became the whole experience.

Most of the noise about dating websites comes from people measuring real activity levels over far too short a window. Happy to answer follow-ups on dating websites if that helps.

Ray Hudson
Joined: Nov 2022
Messages: 47
#4

Disagree, because blaming local deadness lets you off the hook — my dating websites results improved when my profile did.

What changed my results on dating websites was treating the gap between claimed and real users as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem. The thing people underrate about dating websites is how much the count of accounts actually online depends on your own city.

One smaller option worth comparing on local deadness is Rendate — different pool, same free messaging as dating websites.

Join Free Today

Your dating websites profile stays free for as long as you use it.

RobbieQ
Joined: Apr 2021
Messages: 602
#5

This matches what I found with dating websites, where the count of accounts actually online is exactly where it falls down.

I keep two accounts running to compare the count of accounts actually online across free platforms, and dating websites sits mid-table.

People also mention datewander.site, datescout.site, datebie.online whenever dating websites comes up on this board.

Cole Fisher
Joined: Oct 2020
Messages: 288
#6

@RobbieQ makes a fair point about dating websites, but yes, and I would add that genuine daily activity on dating websites gets worse the longer you stay.

Most of the noise about dating websites comes from people measuring local density over far too short a window. Whatever you pick, judge dating websites on local density after a month rather than after a weekend.

Three things that changed my dating websites results:

  • Log in at the hours you would actually go out; dating websites activity is nothing like flat
  • Ask most people in this thread what dating websites is like where they actually live, not where you wish you lived
  • Fill the prompts in properly; blank profiles get skipped on dating websites
  • Screenshot anything odd on dating websites before you report it — local density claims need evidence

I keep Luvdate open as a control while testing dating websites — useful for judging local density honestly.

Scott_NY
Joined: Apr 2023
Messages: 1033
#7

That tracks with my dating websites run, which was fine until real activity levels became the whole experience.

Nobody warns you that genuine daily activity on dating websites scales with how many people are online at your hours. I keep two accounts running to compare local deadness across no-payment dating sites, and dating websites sits mid-table.

How I would approach dating websites from scratch:

  • Run dating websites beside one other option so you have a baseline for the gap between claimed and real users
  • Turn off read receipts on dating websites if genuine daily activity is making you anxious about response times
  • Compare dating websites against free dating apps on the same week, or the comparison is meaningless
  • Message within a day of matching — on dating websites that window closes fast
  • Give dating websites a fortnight of daily use before calling real activity levels a dealbreaker
Monica_H
Joined: Aug 2021
Messages: 215
#8

@Scott_NY makes a fair point about dating websites, but agreed, although with dating websites I would frame the count of accounts actually online as a symptom rather than the cause.

What changed my results on dating websites was treating local deadness as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem. The pattern I see with dating websites is that real activity levels is fine early and degrades as you go.

Anyone comparing dating websites on the count of accounts actually online should probably add Flurrydate to the list.

More from Free Dating & Apps

Join Now — Free

Free to browse, free to match, free to message across dating websites.