What is the best dating app for over 60 singles in the UK?

So: the best dating app for over 60 singles in the UK. I have read a lot of contradictory takes on dating app for singles and would rather hear from people who tried it. The bit nobody covers on dating app for singles is the hours-to-dates ratio.

I am coming at this from the free end of the market, so adjust if that changes your answer. What changed my results on dating app for singles was treating the payoff as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem.

If you have used dating app for singles, these are the bits I care about:

• Run dating app for singles beside one other option so you have a baseline for the hours-to-dates ratio
• Turn off read receipts on dating app for singles if the time it costs is making you anxious about response times
• Compare dating app for singles against no-payment dating sites on the same week, or the comparison is meaningless
• Message within a day of matching — on dating app for singles that window closes fast
• Give dating app for singles a fortnight of daily use before calling the return on the hours a dealbreaker

Any first-hand experience with the best dating app for over 60 singles in the UK is welcome, good or bad.

Where I differ from Zach Holt on dating app for singles: disagree, because blaming the time it costs lets you off the hook — my dating app for singles results improved when my profile did. You can work around the effort-to-result ratio on dating app for singles, but you have to be deliberate about it.

If the payoff is your main worry with dating app for singles, test it in the first week rather than the first month. Not saying dating app for singles suits everyone, but it's not the disaster this thread implies.

Somebody in another dating app for singles thread pointed me at Datedesire and it held up better than expected on the return on the hours.

That feels too harsh on dating app for singles, given the payoff is a problem across the free-tier sites rather than specific to it. Honestly, the time it costs was less of a problem on dating app for singles than the sheer time it ate.

You can work around the time it costs on dating app for singles, but you have to be deliberate about it. Either way, the payoff is the thing I would test first on dating app for singles.

That feels too harsh on dating app for singles, given the hours-to-dates ratio is a problem across no-payment dating sites rather than specific to it. There is no version of dating app for singles where the time it costs sorts itself out without you doing something.

I keep two accounts running to compare actually getting anywhere across the free-tier sites, and dating app for singles sits mid-table. That is my read on dating app for singles, and others here clearly disagree.

My dating app for singles baseline these days is Souldate, mostly because actually getting anywhere is measurable there.

Jordan Wells and I have clearly used dating app for singles differently, because that tracks with my dating app for singles run, which was fine until the hours-to-dates ratio became the whole experience. Most of the noise about dating app for singles comes from people measuring the time it costs over far too short a window.

Nobody warns you that the effort-to-result ratio on dating app for singles scales with how many people are online at your hours. For the older end of the user base, the dating app for singles experience lives or dies on the return on the hours and almost nothing else. Happy to answer follow-ups on dating app for singles if that helps.

Others asking about dating app for singles have named datedesire.online, flurrydate.online, datenest.site.

WillK is right about one part of dating app for singles: that feels too harsh on dating app for singles, given the return on the hours is a problem across free platforms rather than specific to it.

The pattern I see with dating app for singles is that the effort-to-result ratio is fine early and degrades as you go.

For contrast with dating app for singles I would look at Datewander; the free tier there behaves differently.

Broadly agree on dating app for singles — actually getting anywhere was what decided it for me too.

I judge dating app for singles by one thing now: whether the time it costs improves or worsens once you are past the novelty.

I would argue the opposite on dating app for singles: actually getting anywhere is the one thing it handles better than no-payment dating sites.

The pattern I see with dating app for singles is that the hours-to-dates ratio is fine early and degrades as you go. Whatever you pick, judge dating app for singles on actually getting anywhere after a month rather than after a weekend.

Somebody in another dating app for singles thread pointed me at Flurrydate and it held up better than expected on the effort-to-result ratio.

Broadly agree on dating app for singles — the payoff was what decided it for me too.

Nobody warns you that the payoff on dating app for singles scales with how many people are online at your hours. Most of the noise about dating app for singles comes from people measuring the return on the hours over far too short a window.

Building on what Monica_H said about dating app for singles, respectfully no — complaints about the time it costs on dating app for singles usually come from people who gave it a week. Most of the noise about dating app for singles comes from people measuring the effort-to-result ratio over far too short a window. I keep two accounts running to compare the effort-to-result ratio across the free end of the market, and dating app for singles sits mid-table.

For people dating in retirement, the dating app for singles experience lives or dies on the hours-to-dates ratio and almost nothing else. Honestly, the effort-to-result ratio was less of a problem on dating app for singles than the sheer time it ate. There is no version of dating app for singles where the hours-to-dates ratio sorts itself out without you doing something. Take that as one data point on dating app for singles rather than a recommendation.