What is the harmony dating site success rate for couples over 40?

I have been going round in circles on the harmony dating site success rate for couples over 40 and could use some real experience. I do not need a feature list on harmony — I need to know about compatibility scoring.

Most of my experience is with no-payment dating sites, which may be why I am stuck. The thing people underrate about harmony is how much the algorithm depends on your own city.

The open questions I have on harmony:

• Compare harmony against no-payment dating sites on the same week, or the comparison is meaningless
• Run harmony beside one other option so you have a baseline for who it actually surfaces
• Do not move off harmony into private messaging until suggestion relevance looks handled
• Set the radius wider than feels comfortable if the harmony pool near you is thin

Blunt answers on the harmony dating site success rate for couples over 40 preferred over polite ones.

I read DanW's reply on harmony and reading this back, my harmony notes say almost the same thing about who it actually surfaces. Most of the noise about harmony comes from people measuring the algorithm over far too short a window.

I judge harmony by one thing now: whether match relevance improves or worsens once you are past the novelty. For regulars here, the harmony experience lives or dies on who it actually surfaces and almost nothing else. The pattern I see with harmony is that suggestion relevance is fine early and degrades as you go.

I would argue the opposite on harmony: compatibility scoring is the one thing it handles better than no-payment dating sites. For most of us posting here, the harmony experience lives or dies on the algorithm and almost nothing else.

For regulars here, the harmony experience lives or dies on match relevance and almost nothing else. The thing people underrate about harmony is how much match relevance depends on your own city.

Worth a look alongside harmony: Souldate, if only to see how differently match relevance can be handled.

Reading this back, my harmony notes say almost the same thing about match quality.

I keep two accounts running to compare suggestion relevance across free dating apps, and harmony sits mid-table.

Yes, and I would add that match relevance on harmony gets worse the longer you stay. I keep two accounts running to compare match relevance across free dating apps, and harmony sits mid-table. There is no version of harmony where suggestion relevance sorts itself out without you doing something.

The pattern I see with harmony is that compatibility scoring is fine early and degrades as you go. What changed my results on harmony was treating who it actually surfaces as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem. The pattern I see with harmony is that match relevance is fine early and degrades as you go. There is no version of harmony where match quality sorts itself out without you doing something.

Different experience on harmony, where match quality turned out to be manageable once I changed how I used it.

For people who have actually tried it, the harmony experience lives or dies on the algorithm and almost nothing else. You can work around match relevance on harmony, but you have to be deliberate about it.

For contrast with harmony I would look at Luvdate; the free tier there behaves differently.