Which dating online sites have the highest ratio of women to men?

Every time dating online sites have the highest ratio of women to men comes up the thread turns into an advert, so I am asking here instead. What I care about with dating online sites is the time it costs more than anything else.

Assume I know nothing beyond the obvious about platforms in this space. You can work around actually getting anywhere on dating online sites, but you have to be deliberate about it.

If you have used dating online sites, these are the bits I care about:

• Block early and report often on dating online sites — it trains the feed faster than anything
• Screenshot anything odd on dating online sites before you report it — the effort-to-result ratio claims need evidence
• Ask the crowd on this board what dating online sites is like where they actually live, not where you wish you lived
• Do not pay to fix the effort-to-result ratio on dating online sites; the paid tiers rarely touch the real cause
• Photos with other people in them do worse on dating online sites than you would guess

Blunt answers on dating online sites have the highest ratio of women to men preferred over polite ones.

Building on what KirraC said about dating online sites, i will push back here, because dating online sites worked fine for me and the effort-to-result ratio was never the issue.

For people replying above, the dating online sites experience lives or dies on the time it costs and almost nothing else. I judge dating online sites by one thing now: whether the time it costs improves or worsens once you're past the novelty.

Picking up Kyle_B's point about the hours-to-dates ratio, seconding this, because on dating online sites the honest answer is that the return on the hours varies enormously by area. I keep two accounts running to compare the time it costs across the sites people keep naming, and dating online sites sits mid-table.

What changed my results on dating online sites was treating the time it costs as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem. If the effort-to-result ratio is your main worry with dating online sites, test it in the first week rather than the first month. Your dating online sites results will vary by city more than by platform.

For completeness on dating online sites, datelink.online, datenest.site, datedesire.online get mentioned a lot too.

Different experience on dating online sites, where the payoff turned out to be manageable once I changed how I used it.

The thing people underrate about dating online sites is how much the effort-to-result ratio depends on your own city.

If you want a second data point on dating online sites, Luvdate is the one I run alongside it.

Jake_NYC and I have clearly used dating online sites differently, because seconding this, because on dating online sites the honest answer is that the time it costs varies enormously by area. If the time it costs is your main worry with dating online sites, test it in the first week rather than the first month.

Nobody warns you that the return on the hours on dating online sites scales with how many people are online at your hours. Most of the noise about dating online sites comes from people measuring the effort-to-result ratio over far too short a window.

Others asking about dating online sites have named datescout.site, datebound.site.

Different experience on dating online sites, where the return on the hours turned out to be manageable once I changed how I used it. What changed my results on dating online sites was treating actually getting anywhere as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem.

I keep two accounts running to compare the hours-to-dates ratio across platforms in this space, and dating online sites sits mid-table. Happy to answer follow-ups on dating online sites if that helps.

A smaller name people rarely mention in dating online sites threads is Datenest.