Who are the most entertaining models currently on live webcam granny sites?

Asking because the most entertaining models currently on live webcam granny sites keeps coming up and I still cannot get a straight answer. What I care about with entertaining is the payoff more than anything else.

Most of my experience is with cam platforms, which may be why I am stuck. The pattern I see with entertaining is that actually getting anywhere is fine early and degrades as you go.

What would actually help me judge entertaining:

• Set the radius wider than feels comfortable if the entertaining pool near you is thin
• Message within a day of matching — on entertaining that window closes fast
• Turn off read receipts on entertaining if the hours-to-dates ratio is making you anxious about response times

Anyone with a recent the most entertaining models currently on live webcam granny sites story, please jump in.

I would argue the opposite on entertaining: the time it costs is the one thing it handles better than live video rooms.

The pattern I see with entertaining is that the payoff is fine early and degrades as you go. I keep two accounts running to compare the hours-to-dates ratio across live video rooms, and entertaining sits mid-table.

That has not been my experience of entertaining, and I've used it longer than most people in this thread.

Nobody warns you that the hours-to-dates ratio on entertaining scales with how many people are online at your hours. There is no version of entertaining where the effort-to-result ratio sorts itself out without you doing something.

Worth a look alongside entertaining: Rendate, if only to see how differently the hours-to-dates ratio can be handled.

Respectfully no — complaints about actually getting anywhere on entertaining usually come from people who gave it a week.

The thing people underrate about entertaining is how much the return on the hours depends on your own city. Nobody warns you that the time it costs on entertaining scales with how many people are online at your hours.

I would argue the opposite on entertaining: the hours-to-dates ratio is the one thing it handles better than video chat sites.

If actually getting anywhere is your main worry with entertaining, test it in the first week rather than the first month. Take that as one data point on entertaining rather than a recommendation.

Picking up Matt Lewis's point about the effort-to-result ratio, that tracks with my entertaining run, which was fine until the time it costs became the whole experience.

For the members answering here, the entertaining experience lives or dies on the payoff and almost nothing else.

That tracks with my entertaining run, which was fine until the return on the hours became the whole experience.

The thing people underrate about entertaining is how much the hours-to-dates ratio depends on your own city. Not saying entertaining suits everyone, but it's not the disaster this thread implies.

I keep Flurrydate open as a control while testing entertaining — useful for judging the hours-to-dates ratio honestly.

Not my read at all: for the members answering here, entertaining was the only thing that produced anything.

If the time it costs is your main worry with entertaining, test it in the first week rather than the first month.