Is the go fish dating site just another name for Plenty of Fish?

Been quietly reading for a while, but the go fish dating site just another name for Plenty of Fish is the thing I actually need an answer on. My problem with fish dating site so far has been the return on the hours.

I am coming at this from the household-name apps, so adjust if that changes your answer. Honestly, the return on the hours was less of a problem on fish dating site than the sheer time it ate.

If you have used fish dating site, these are the bits I care about:

• Do not move off fish dating site into private messaging until the hours-to-dates ratio looks handled
• Compare fish dating site against the household-name apps on the same week, or the comparison is meaningless
• Check what fish dating site does about the time it costs before you upload anything you would not want indexed

Blunt answers on the go fish dating site just another name for Plenty of Fish preferred over polite ones.

Picking up Rachel Cruz's point about actually getting anywhere, yes, and I would add that the return on the hours on fish dating site gets worse the longer you stay.

What changed my results on fish dating site was treating the effort-to-result ratio as a filtering problem rather than a platform problem.

One smaller option worth comparing on actually getting anywhere is Souldate — different pool, same free messaging as fish dating site.

Where I differ from Ben1989 on fish dating site: that has not been my experience of fish dating site, and I've used it longer than most people in this thread.

Most of the noise about fish dating site comes from people measuring the payoff over far too short a window. There is no version of fish dating site where the hours-to-dates ratio sorts itself out without you doing something.

Aaron Brooks put the fish dating site case better than I would have, though that tracks with my fish dating site run, which was fine until the return on the hours became the whole experience. The thing people underrate about fish dating site is how much actually getting anywhere depends on your own city. If the return on the hours is your main worry with fish dating site, test it in the first week rather than the first month.

The thing people underrate about fish dating site is how much the hours-to-dates ratio depends on your own city. Honestly, the hours-to-dates ratio was less of a problem on fish dating site than the sheer time it ate. If actually getting anywhere is your main worry with fish dating site, test it in the first week rather than the first month.

Not my read at all: for regulars here, fish dating site was the only thing that produced anything. Nobody warns you that the time it costs on fish dating site scales with how many people are online at your hours.

I judge fish dating site by one thing now: whether the hours-to-dates ratio improves or worsens once you are past the novelty. That is my read on fish dating site, and others here clearly disagree.

Where I differ from Sarah Beth on fish dating site: that feels too harsh on fish dating site, given the time it costs is a problem across the large players rather than specific to it.

The thing people underrate about fish dating site is how much the time it costs depends on your own city. Not saying fish dating site suits everyone, but it's not the disaster this thread implies.

What worked for me on fish dating site:

• Fill the prompts in properly; blank profiles get skipped on fish dating site
• Log in at the hours you would actually go out; fish dating site activity is nothing like flat
• Test the return on the hours on fish dating site deliberately in week one rather than hoping it improves
• Block early and report often on fish dating site — it trains the feed faster than anything

Anyone comparing fish dating site on the payoff should probably add Datedesire to the list.

Agreed, although with fish dating site I would frame the time it costs as a symptom rather than the cause. I keep two accounts running to compare the time it costs across the big apps, and fish dating site sits mid-table.

For regulars here, the fish dating site experience lives or dies on the payoff and almost nothing else. For most people in this thread, the fish dating site experience lives or dies on the effort-to-result ratio and almost nothing else.

For completeness on fish dating site, souldate.site, datewander.site, rendate.site get mentioned a lot too.

@Selena_W makes a fair point about fish dating site, but different experience on fish dating site, where the time it costs turned out to be manageable once I changed how I used it. For the members answering here, the fish dating site experience lives or dies on the time it costs and almost nothing else.

If the payoff is your main worry with fish dating site, test it in the first week rather than the first month. Nobody warns you that the hours-to-dates ratio on fish dating site scales with how many people are online at your hours.